|
Article: Consistently
Inconsistent
By: Natalie R. Manor
CEO Memo from the Corner Office
Business NH Magazine (January 2007)
After 20
years of working in the human behavior and growing
leaders, it is my experience that communicating
effectively and with ease is still an issue.
Google has
542,000,000 references regarding leadership and
communication. Considering all the information we have
access to you would think we would have it mastered by
now.
From the
C-suite to the entry level leader, there are certain key
skills that need to be learned and honed. These are
interpersonal skills and they need to be developed and
fostered throughout our careers.
The
interpersonal skills I am referring to are:
-
Listening
-
Setting
context
-
Communicating clearly
-
Creating
high value relationships
-
Building
teams
-
Recruiting and retaining our people
-
Engaging
in rapport to build trust and respect
-
Providing feedback to maximize performance and
increase productivity
-
Setting
performance goals
-
Delivering difficult information in a timely way
-
Developing a cultural that supports both the people
and the output
The evidence
of inconsistent application of highly effective
interpersonal skills is getting worse. “We are not
communicating effectively to our people; clients;
stakeholders” is the workplace definition of
communication issues and yet they continue to increase.
The senior leader is often times the least effective
communicator in the organization.
What is a
leader to do? Get back to the basics of what leadership
and communication mean, develop a plan, implement it,
practice it and then measure it.
My
experience with coaching, facilitating and training
executive teams is that time and resources have bitten
into our timeliness in developing our communication
skills and then continuing to communicate in a highly
effective way. Here is a brief example of what I mean:
Setting
context: Joe walks into a meeting, tells the group that
they will be replicating the same proposal they used in
November to those people in Europe and expects the
report to be on his desk by 3:00pm.
Joe assumes that each person in the meeting is
completely clear what he means when he says:
a) proposal
b) group in Europe
c) which November he is referring to
By not
setting context, Joe creates a wave of activity not
productivity. People will be scrambling to find the
report; asking others if they know which report he was
referring to; finding November reports and comparing
them and then moving on to groups in Europe that might
be the right group.
Joe could
have avoided creating a wave unproductive activity by
setting good context and being clear in his
instructions/comments to the people at the meeting.
Here is a way that Joe can change his
instructions/comment to set context and create clarity:
“Our next
steps in producing a proposal will be to use the
November 13, 2005 document we presented to the group
from Europe – The XYZ Company – as a shell. We will use
this shell to detail our 4 key ideas about their
marketing issues so that they can make a decision by the
close of business next Friday. Any questions on which
proposal I am talking about? Can we get this to me by
3:00pm today?”
The
difference between the first and second communication
from Joe is where the communication consistency lives.
He set context and provided clarity. Joe gave his team
an opportunity to provide feedback and ask questions.
Often after
a training session with an executive team the comments
will be that “of course, I know how to communicate
effectively”. Yes, but are you doing it?
When we
measure whether communication is effective and clear
from the C-suite to the rest of the organization, we
find that 70% of the information is not clear, not
understood, not acted on correctly.
All
communication can be effective. However, we continue to
produce organizations that are short on time and
resources and long on stress.
As leaders,
we need to enforce the first rules of communication: to
be clear, set the context, be timely and for feedback to
make sure our instructions/comments are understood.
The results of setting a good context for communication
is that people feel that they are in rapport with the
communicator, they trust and respect the origination of
the information and will act on it with enthusiasm.
Being
consistently inconsistent in delivering clear and
accurate information creates a culture of stress.
People who are consistently stressed and not
communicated with well create waves of activity without
a lot of productivity. They spend too much time
wondering what is next.
My 20 years
of experience in working with leaders is that they need
to be completely committed to the classic leadership
skills that continually make organizations great.
Communicating clearly is the most basic of these classic
leadership skills and it has yet to gain the importance,
emphasis and urgency that companies many times pay to
the bottom line, business strategy and client needs.
The cycle is
actually very clear. If you begin with a precise and
highly effective communication strategy internally and
externally, your business strategies will be elegant and
profoundly effective.
Garbage in
garbage out. I have been known to be too direct, but in
this case I think the communication and leadership
crisis in organization speaks for itself. You can
produce outstanding performance and sustainable results
by communicating in a clear, concise, and context
setting way.
Superb
communication is a daily practice. It develops through
an awareness that nothing is done without
communication. Our methods of communicating have
changed drastically through the use of email and
reduction of face to face or telephone communication.
What is lost
in the use of email is the being able to read and hear
the other person. 55% of our communication is done
through our body. 38% of our communication is
accomplished through our actual tone when speaking
and/or the pace of our speaking. 7% of our
communication effectiveness is through the use of
words. These statistics are not just in the USA; they
are global and apply to all humans.
We are all
using email in a way to communicate almost all
information and yet we are not even doing it well. 1%
of the companies we work with have an email policy of
how a good email should be written; conveyed;
constructed; used and yet 93% of most organizations are
relying on email to communicate most of their
information.
The demands
for speed in our workplace are creating an even greater
need to communicate elegantly and effectively. The idea
that creating a communication plan is a back burner
strategy is not optional anymore. The organizations that
we have worked with that have “gotten” this have
provided a tipping point for their success.
Communicating well is an act of significant strategy.
Leaders need
to communicate well, consistently, with clarity while
setting context. You need only to think of those
leaders and organizations that inspire you to know that
communicating effectively is a key strategy and the
first skill that all leaders need to learn and
continually hone.
© Copyright
2009 by Natalie Manor. All Rights Reserved. This article
may be copied and used in your own newsletter or on your
website as long as you include the following
information: "Written by Natalie R. Manor, CEO, author,
speaker and executive coach. NMA, Natalie Manor &
Associates is your ultimate resource for leadership and
communication development for managers and executives to
maximize your potential and increase your productivity.
Success@NatalieManor.com,
(800) 666-2230,
http://www.NatalieManor.com”
|